zurück zur Liste - wa-ID
- wa-2027008
- Tag der Veröffentlichung
- 09.07.2019
- Aktualisiert am
- 15.01.2020
- Verfahrensart
- Nicht offener Wettbewerb
- Zulassungsbereich
-
EWG
- Koordination
- RIBA Competitions, Leeds
- Bewerbungsschluss
- 02.09.2019
- Preisgerichtssitzung
- 13.01.2020
Verfahrensart
Nicht offener Wettbewerb
Wettbewerbsaufgabe
This competition invited multi-disciplinary teams of architects, landscape architects, ecologists, engineers, artists and other professions to develop a green, creative vision and strategy to underpin the future development of the Low Line.
The Low Line is a path through some of London’s oldest neighbourhoods, offering a new perspective on an immensely well-known but ever-evolving part of town. Following the historic rail viaducts just south of the River Thames, the corridor of the Low Line reveals hidden walkways and enclosed courtyards, connecting such great landmarks as the Tate Modern, Borough Market, Southwark Cathedral, London Bridge Station and beyond.
The Low Line links diverse neighbourhoods and communities, leading visitors off the beaten track and into areas of creativity, history, industry and entertainment, such as Union Yard Arches, Flat Iron Square and Vinegar Yard, Maltby Street and Bermondsey. It celebrates the heritage of the railway arches and unlocks the potential of derelict and forgotten sites.
The aim of the Low Line competition was to develop a unifying vision and strategy, to inform the delivery of greening and biodiversity enhancements along and adjacent to the Low Line, that could help support social, environmental and economic well-being. This can also be implemented organically over time as the Low Line route evolves.
The initial phase of the competition invited teams of architects, landscape architects, designers, ecologists and other design-related disciplines to submit designs anonymously, in digital format only. Five concept designs were then shortlisted for further development.
The evaluation panel included Lisbet Rausing, Founder of Lund Trust; Graham Morrison, Partner at Allies and Morrison, as the RIBA Adviser, and Adam White, President of the Landscape Institute.
The Low Line was developed through a group of initial partners including Better Bankside, Team London Bridge, Blue Bermondsey, Southwark Council, the Arch Company and Borough Market, who are steering the initial scoping, planning and communication of the project. The Low Line name was coined by Southwark resident David Stephens.
Mehr unter
www.ribacompetitions.com/low_line/
Nicht offener Wettbewerb
Wettbewerbsaufgabe
This competition invited multi-disciplinary teams of architects, landscape architects, ecologists, engineers, artists and other professions to develop a green, creative vision and strategy to underpin the future development of the Low Line.
The Low Line is a path through some of London’s oldest neighbourhoods, offering a new perspective on an immensely well-known but ever-evolving part of town. Following the historic rail viaducts just south of the River Thames, the corridor of the Low Line reveals hidden walkways and enclosed courtyards, connecting such great landmarks as the Tate Modern, Borough Market, Southwark Cathedral, London Bridge Station and beyond.
The Low Line links diverse neighbourhoods and communities, leading visitors off the beaten track and into areas of creativity, history, industry and entertainment, such as Union Yard Arches, Flat Iron Square and Vinegar Yard, Maltby Street and Bermondsey. It celebrates the heritage of the railway arches and unlocks the potential of derelict and forgotten sites.
The aim of the Low Line competition was to develop a unifying vision and strategy, to inform the delivery of greening and biodiversity enhancements along and adjacent to the Low Line, that could help support social, environmental and economic well-being. This can also be implemented organically over time as the Low Line route evolves.
The initial phase of the competition invited teams of architects, landscape architects, designers, ecologists and other design-related disciplines to submit designs anonymously, in digital format only. Five concept designs were then shortlisted for further development.
The evaluation panel included Lisbet Rausing, Founder of Lund Trust; Graham Morrison, Partner at Allies and Morrison, as the RIBA Adviser, and Adam White, President of the Landscape Institute.
The Low Line was developed through a group of initial partners including Better Bankside, Team London Bridge, Blue Bermondsey, Southwark Council, the Arch Company and Borough Market, who are steering the initial scoping, planning and communication of the project. The Low Line name was coined by Southwark resident David Stephens.
Mehr unter
www.ribacompetitions.com/low_line/
09/07/2019 S130 - - Services - Design contest - Restricted procedure
United Kingdom-Leeds: Architectural services for outdoor areas
2019/S 130-320159
Design contest notice
Legal Basis:
Directive 2014/24/EU
Section I: Contracting authority
/entity
I.1) Name and addresses
Better Bankside
c/o RIBA Competition, No. 1 Aire Street
Leeds
LS1 4PR
United Kingdom
Contact person: Hannah Rylatt
Telephone: +44 1132031490
E-mail: riba.competitions@riba.org
NUTS code: UK
Internet address(es):
Main address: www.betterbankside.co.uk
I.2) Information about joint procurement
I.3) Communication
The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at: www.ribacompetitions.com/Low_Line
Additional information can be obtained from the abovementioned address
Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted to the abovementioned address
I.4) Type of the contracting authority
Other type: Business Improvement District
I.5) Main activity
Environment
Section II: Object
II.1) Scope of the procurement
II.1.1) Title:
A Green Vision for the Low Line
II.1.2) Main CPV code
71222000
II.2) Description
II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
71420000
II.2.4) Description of the procurement:
In a design contest with restricted procedure at Phase 1 designers submit their design solutions anonymously in response to your brief. These designs are then assessed anonymously by the evaluation panel in accordance with the published criteria. A shortlist of 5 practices (minimum) will then be selected to proceed to phase 2.
Shortlisted teams will be provided with feedback on their schemes and the Phase 2 brief and invited to submit developed designs which are assessed anonymously by the panel in accordance with the phase 2 criteria.
A honorarium payment will be awarded to all five shortlisted teams. The winner will be appointed subject to funding.
The competition will be opened up to eligible competitors based in the UK, Europe and as required by the client, worldwide.
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
Section III: Legal, economic, financial and technical information
III.1) Conditions for participation
III.1.10) Criteria for the selection of participants:
Phase 1: Evaluation criteria
Overall quality of the design concept, including response to the site, its ability to improve on the green character of the area and enhance the public realm: 50 %.
Response to the brief, and project aspirations for increased biodiversity, social and economic benefits of reconnecting neighbourhoods: 35 %
Clear communication of ideas to explain the ethos behind the proposals: 15 %
Phase 2: Evaluation criteria
1) Response to feedback and refinement of proposal ideas following Phase 1 assessments: 30 %
2 Viability of the proposals with clear balance of creativity versus pragmatism, to ensure that proposed concepts are commercially deliverable: 25 %
3) Demonstration of understanding the project requirements, in particular the schemes ability to, reconnect neighbourhoods from Bankside in the west, through London Bridge to Bermondsey in the east, strengthen the green character and biodiversity of the area with high-quality placemaking: 25 %
4) Submission of a competitive fee proposal (broken down per RIBA work stage) to deliver the quality and include the demonstration of a sufficient level of resourcing to deliver the quality and scope of design services required 20 %.
III.2) Conditions related to the contract
III.2.1) Information about a particular profession
Section IV: Procedure
IV.1) Description
IV.1.2) Type of contest
Restricted
Minimum number: 5
IV.1.7) Names of participants already selected:
IV.1.9) Criteria for the evaluation of projects:
Phase 1
1) Overall quality of the design concept, including response to the site, its ability to improve on the green character of the area and enhance the public realm (50 %)
2) Response to the brief, and project aspirations for increased biodiversity, social and economic benefits of reconnecting neighbourhoods (35 %)
3) Clear communication of ideas to explain the ethos behind the proposals (15 %)
Phase 2
1) Response to feedback and refinement of proposal ideas following Phase 1 assessments: 30 %
2) Viability of the proposals with clear balance of creativity versus pragmatism, to ensure that proposed concepts are commercially deliverable: 25 %
3) Demonstration of understanding the project requirements, in particular the schemes ability to, reconnect neighbourhoods from Bankside in the west, through London Bridge to Bermondsey in the east, strengthen the green character and biodiversity of the area with high-quality placemaking: 25 %
4) Submission of a competitive fee proposal (broken down per RIBA work stage) to deliver the quality and include the demonstration of a sufficient level of resourcing to deliver the quality and scope of design services required 20 %.
IV.2) Administrative information
IV.2.2) Time limit for receipt of projects or requests to participate
Date: 02/09/2019
Local time: 14:00
IV.2.3) Date of dispatch of invitations to participate to selected candidates
IV.2.4) Languages in which projects or requests to participate may be drawn up:
English
IV.3) Rewards and jury
IV.3.1) Information about prize(s)
A prize/prizes will be awarded: yes
Number and value of the prize(s) to be awarded:
5 shortlisted teams will be awarded an honorarium of 5 000 GBP to progress their designs in Phase 2 of the design contest. It is the intention of the client, subject to funding that the winning scheme will be taken forward to planning in the first instance.
IV.3.2) Details of payments to all participants:
N/a
IV.3.3) Follow-up contracts
Any service contract following the contest will be awarded to the winner or winners of the contest: yes
IV.3.4) Decision of the jury
The decision of the jury is binding on the contracting authority/entity: yes
IV.3.5) Names of the selected members of the jury:
Lisbet rausing
Donald Hyslop
Johanna Gibbons
Graham Morrison
Adam White
Julia Thrift
Tim Rettler
Robert McAuliffe
Rebecca Lury
Section VI: Complementary information
VI.3) Additional information
:
VI.4) Procedures for review
VI.4.1) Review body
High Court of England and Wales
London
United Kingdom
VI.4.2) Body responsible for mediation procedures
VI.4.3) Review procedure
Precise information on deadline(s) for review procedures:
N/a
VI.4.4) Service from which information about the review procedure may be obtained
VI.5) Date of dispatch of this notice:
05/07/2019
United Kingdom-Leeds: Architectural services for outdoor areas
2019/S 130-320159
Design contest notice
Legal Basis:
Directive 2014/24/EU
Section I: Contracting authority
/entity
I.1) Name and addresses
Better Bankside
c/o RIBA Competition, No. 1 Aire Street
Leeds
LS1 4PR
United Kingdom
Contact person: Hannah Rylatt
Telephone: +44 1132031490
E-mail: riba.competitions@riba.org
NUTS code: UK
Internet address(es):
Main address: www.betterbankside.co.uk
I.2) Information about joint procurement
I.3) Communication
The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at: www.ribacompetitions.com/Low_Line
Additional information can be obtained from the abovementioned address
Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted to the abovementioned address
I.4) Type of the contracting authority
Other type: Business Improvement District
I.5) Main activity
Environment
Section II: Object
II.1) Scope of the procurement
II.1.1) Title:
A Green Vision for the Low Line
II.1.2) Main CPV code
71222000
II.2) Description
II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
71420000
II.2.4) Description of the procurement:
In a design contest with restricted procedure at Phase 1 designers submit their design solutions anonymously in response to your brief. These designs are then assessed anonymously by the evaluation panel in accordance with the published criteria. A shortlist of 5 practices (minimum) will then be selected to proceed to phase 2.
Shortlisted teams will be provided with feedback on their schemes and the Phase 2 brief and invited to submit developed designs which are assessed anonymously by the panel in accordance with the phase 2 criteria.
A honorarium payment will be awarded to all five shortlisted teams. The winner will be appointed subject to funding.
The competition will be opened up to eligible competitors based in the UK, Europe and as required by the client, worldwide.
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
Section III: Legal, economic, financial and technical information
III.1) Conditions for participation
III.1.10) Criteria for the selection of participants:
Phase 1: Evaluation criteria
Overall quality of the design concept, including response to the site, its ability to improve on the green character of the area and enhance the public realm: 50 %.
Response to the brief, and project aspirations for increased biodiversity, social and economic benefits of reconnecting neighbourhoods: 35 %
Clear communication of ideas to explain the ethos behind the proposals: 15 %
Phase 2: Evaluation criteria
1) Response to feedback and refinement of proposal ideas following Phase 1 assessments: 30 %
2 Viability of the proposals with clear balance of creativity versus pragmatism, to ensure that proposed concepts are commercially deliverable: 25 %
3) Demonstration of understanding the project requirements, in particular the schemes ability to, reconnect neighbourhoods from Bankside in the west, through London Bridge to Bermondsey in the east, strengthen the green character and biodiversity of the area with high-quality placemaking: 25 %
4) Submission of a competitive fee proposal (broken down per RIBA work stage) to deliver the quality and include the demonstration of a sufficient level of resourcing to deliver the quality and scope of design services required 20 %.
III.2) Conditions related to the contract
III.2.1) Information about a particular profession
Section IV: Procedure
IV.1) Description
IV.1.2) Type of contest
Restricted
Minimum number: 5
IV.1.7) Names of participants already selected:
IV.1.9) Criteria for the evaluation of projects:
Phase 1
1) Overall quality of the design concept, including response to the site, its ability to improve on the green character of the area and enhance the public realm (50 %)
2) Response to the brief, and project aspirations for increased biodiversity, social and economic benefits of reconnecting neighbourhoods (35 %)
3) Clear communication of ideas to explain the ethos behind the proposals (15 %)
Phase 2
1) Response to feedback and refinement of proposal ideas following Phase 1 assessments: 30 %
2) Viability of the proposals with clear balance of creativity versus pragmatism, to ensure that proposed concepts are commercially deliverable: 25 %
3) Demonstration of understanding the project requirements, in particular the schemes ability to, reconnect neighbourhoods from Bankside in the west, through London Bridge to Bermondsey in the east, strengthen the green character and biodiversity of the area with high-quality placemaking: 25 %
4) Submission of a competitive fee proposal (broken down per RIBA work stage) to deliver the quality and include the demonstration of a sufficient level of resourcing to deliver the quality and scope of design services required 20 %.
IV.2) Administrative information
IV.2.2) Time limit for receipt of projects or requests to participate
Date: 02/09/2019
Local time: 14:00
IV.2.3) Date of dispatch of invitations to participate to selected candidates
IV.2.4) Languages in which projects or requests to participate may be drawn up:
English
IV.3) Rewards and jury
IV.3.1) Information about prize(s)
A prize/prizes will be awarded: yes
Number and value of the prize(s) to be awarded:
5 shortlisted teams will be awarded an honorarium of 5 000 GBP to progress their designs in Phase 2 of the design contest. It is the intention of the client, subject to funding that the winning scheme will be taken forward to planning in the first instance.
IV.3.2) Details of payments to all participants:
N/a
IV.3.3) Follow-up contracts
Any service contract following the contest will be awarded to the winner or winners of the contest: yes
IV.3.4) Decision of the jury
The decision of the jury is binding on the contracting authority/entity: yes
IV.3.5) Names of the selected members of the jury:
Lisbet rausing
Donald Hyslop
Johanna Gibbons
Graham Morrison
Adam White
Julia Thrift
Tim Rettler
Robert McAuliffe
Rebecca Lury
Section VI: Complementary information
VI.3) Additional information
:
VI.4) Procedures for review
VI.4.1) Review body
High Court of England and Wales
London
United Kingdom
VI.4.2) Body responsible for mediation procedures
VI.4.3) Review procedure
Precise information on deadline(s) for review procedures:
N/a
VI.4.4) Service from which information about the review procedure may be obtained
VI.5) Date of dispatch of this notice:
05/07/2019
